Google Workspace AI use should be inventoried before teams debate duties. This free checklist creates a triage record, not a legal decision. Google Workspace AI checklist: inventory first, legal decision later.
Free Google AI checklist

Google Gemini Workspace EU AI Act Deployer Checklist

If your team uses Gemini in Gmail, Docs, Drive, Sheets, Meet, Chat, NotebookLM, or the Gemini app, start with a short deployer record. This free checker routes the use case to inventory, Article 50, Article 4, vendor evidence, privacy, and oversight review where needed.

No loginFree browser checklistNo compliance guarantee
Google Gemini Workspace EU AI Act deployer checklist workflow for inventory, disclosure, literacy, privacy, and evidence review
Inventory first. Then route the use case to the right evidence record.

Google Workspace AI needs a record before it needs a debate.

The practical first step is not to decide every legal question in one meeting. Record the AI feature, owner, business purpose, data touched, output audience, human review step, and next evidence route. That is the control point for Google Workspace AI adoption.

Inventory signal

Record repeated or material use of Gemini, NotebookLM, or Workspace AI features with owner, purpose, users, data, and evidence location.

Disclosure signal

Check Article 50 when Workspace AI creates user-facing content, chatbot interactions, synthetic media, or public-interest text.

Training signal

Update Article 4 AI literacy evidence for staff using, approving, or supervising Google Workspace AI outputs.

Keep the Workspace AI record small enough to maintain.

A useful record is not a 40-page policy. It is a short table that tells a reviewer what AI feature was used, what data it touched, who reviewed the output, whether users see the output, and which free EU AI Compass tool should be used next.

Google Workspace AI deployer evidence record with service, data, output audience, review owner, and next route fields

Check one Google Workspace AI use case.

Answer seven questions. The result gives an evidence route, not a legal conclusion.

Select the closest surface. The result is a triage route.

Seven fields are enough for a first record.

If the team cannot fill these fields, it is too early to claim the use case is under control.

AI surface and purpose

Service used, business purpose, user group, frequency, and whether the use is experimental, operational, or customer-facing.

Data and audience

Personal, confidential, regulated, public, or low-sensitivity data, plus whether the output stays internal or reaches external people.

Owner and review

Business owner, review owner, approval step, disclosure decision, literacy evidence, and next review date.

Do not run every tool. Use the next free tool that matches the result.

Source basis and limits. Last reviewed: 23 May 2026. Source basis: Google Workspace official information on Gemini in Workspace, Google I/O 2026 AI announcements, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 4, Article 26, and Article 50. This page is operational triage, not legal advice, privacy advice, security advice, certification, or a statement that Google Workspace AI use is automatically high-risk or automatically compliant.

FAQ

Common questions

These answers are for quick routing. They do not replace legal, privacy, security, procurement, or sector review.

Does using Google Gemini in Workspace automatically create EU AI Act deployer duties?

Using Google Gemini in Workspace does not automatically create a single EU AI Act outcome. The organisation should first record the AI use case, purpose, users, data touched, output audience, and decision impact, then route the use case to inventory, Article 4, Article 50, high-risk, privacy, or vendor evidence review where relevant.

Which Google Workspace AI uses should be put in the AI inventory?

Put Google Workspace AI use in the AI inventory when the use is repeated, material, connected to business decisions, used with personal or confidential data, exposed to customers or the public, or relied on by staff. The inventory entry should name the service, owner, purpose, data category, review step, and evidence location.

Does this checklist decide whether a Google Workspace AI use case is high-risk?

This checklist does not decide high-risk status. The checklist identifies evidence routes that may need review. High-risk classification depends on the system purpose, Annex III or Annex I context, role, output use, affected persons, and legal interpretation. Use a separate high-risk classification tool or qualified review for that decision.

What should a team keep after using this checker?

Keep a short Google Workspace AI record with the service used, purpose, owner, data touched, audience, human review step, disclosure signal, AI literacy need, and next evidence route. The record should be linked to the AI inventory so later legal, privacy, security, or audit review does not depend on memory.

Is this Google Gemini Workspace checklist legal advice?

This Google Gemini Workspace checklist is not legal advice. It is an operational triage aid for inventory and evidence planning. Use the result to prepare internal review and then confirm final legal, privacy, security, procurement, or sector decisions with qualified professionals.

Use the checklist result to start your evidence route.

This free Google Gemini Workspace deployer checklist helps you identify inventory, disclosure, training, vendor, and privacy review gaps. Use the result for triage and internal planning, then validate legal, privacy, security, and sector questions with qualified professionals.