Operating Note
This weekly format separates confirmed law, draft/proposal, and soft law / market signals. That distinction is non-negotiable for any product claiming to help users with EU AI Act decisioning.
For the week ending 8 March 2026, the key movement was procedural and soft-law oriented rather than statutory.

1. Confirmed changes
No confirmed changes this period. No new binding amendment, delegated act, implementing act, final standard, AI Act court ruling, or formal AI Act enforcement action was identified in the official sources checked for this week.
2. Proposed changes
- Article 50 Code of Practice: the Commission published the second draft this week. This is voluntary and still in drafting, but commercially important for content governance and app guidance.
- Digital Omnibus on AI: the proposal remains ongoing in the ordinary legislative procedure. It still matters because it could affect how founders view the Annex III and Annex I timeline.
3. Guidance and soft law
The Commission’s Article 4 Q&A and repository of literacy practices remain the most useful operational materials for deployers that need immediate evidence of compliance. Separately, the EDPS disclosed an AI Sandbox pilot, which is useful as an implementation signal rather than a binding rule change.

4. Timeline tracker
| Date | Event | Status | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 February 2025 | Article 5 and Article 4 already applicable | Confirmed | Still the most common live compliance blind spot. |
| 2 August 2026 | Article 50 and Annex III application under current law | Confirmed | Still the baseline unless the law changes. |
| 2 August 2026 | At least one national sandbox operational in each Member State | Confirmed | Implementation pressure is building now. |
| May–June 2026 | Final Article 50 Code targeted | Proposed / planning | Soft-law design signal for content marking. |
5. Founder actions this week
- Urgent: correct any product logic that still shows prohibited practices as starting in August 2025. That is wrong. The live date is 2 February 2025.
- Important: implement dual timelines in customer-facing content and app logic.
- Important: update Article 50 guidance from Draft 1 language to Draft 2 language, clearly labelled as voluntary.
- Monitor: keep watching the Omnibus procedure, but do not let that slow execution on Article 4, Article 5, or Article 50.
Use the timeline, the Compliance Checker, and your content layer together. The content is useful only if it matches the app logic.
About the author: Abhishek G Sharma is the founder of Move78 International Limited.
Disclaimer: This page is educational and operational guidance only. It is not legal advice. Published: March 2026.
Official sources checked
- https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
- https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-second-draft-code-practice-marking-and-labelling-ai-generated-content
- https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/faq
- https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/article-57
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2025_359