What does the checker do?
It screens EU nexus, role, prohibited-practice indicators, Annex I and Annex III triggers, transparency obligations, and likely next steps for one system or a portfolio.
Screen one system or a whole portfolio. Map likely EU nexus, role, prohibited or high-risk triggers, transparency obligations, and next actions — without sending answers to a server.
This page is structured for internal triage, not just interpretation. It helps you screen multiple AI systems consistently, assign owners, record confidence, and convert the result into a prioritized next-action list.
Choose portfolio screening or single-system assessment. All saved items stay in browser local storage on this device.
Add one AI system or use case at a time. The logic mirrors the free workbook’s portfolio screen: EU nexus, prohibited indicators, Annex III triggers, transparency, confidence, and next action.
This table is local to the current browser and device.
| System | Applicability | EU category | Priority | Open items | Milestone | Next action | Actions |
|---|
This free checker helps an SME determine whether a specific AI system or portfolio is likely in scope of the EU AI Act, what role the organisation may be playing, what risk path is most likely, and what next action should happen now. It is designed for fast triage, not formal legal determination.
It screens EU nexus, role, prohibited-practice indicators, Annex I and Annex III triggers, transparency obligations, and likely next steps for one system or a portfolio.
By default, answers stay in local browser storage on the device you are using. Nothing is sent to a server unless you manually export the results and share them yourself.
No. This is an operational triage tool created for educational and implementation-planning purposes. It is not an official EU service, legal opinion, conformity assessment, or certification.
The hero section stacks vertically, the navigation collapses into a mobile menu, form sections become single-column, and the saved-items table scrolls horizontally inside its own container instead of breaking the layout.
Move to a deeper assessment when the result suggests prohibited use, likely high-risk classification, transparency obligations, GPAI dependence, or when confidence is low and the facts remain incomplete.